Weissmuller's SPUE Theory

An Overview of Weissmüller's SPUE Theory

Magnetism, Gravity, Speed of Light, Black Holes, Van der Waals -- Atoms & Galaxies

15 October 2005 Update: A New Perspective that "Black Holes" may not be the boogey man after all...

Black Holes -- Boogey Men or Pussy Cats? (It depends on the Neighborhood)

First Thoughts (July 2004)

Original thoughts in SPUE Theory turned "black holes" into pussy cats that paw at passing light beams (i.e. SPUE streams bent due to pin-point shadows from "microscopic sized" black holes on rotating SPUE Blobs). At first I thought that black holes can offer no great impact on either space or time -- only provide a "shadow" in the Universal SPUE Wind around them. A very very dense black hole that is tiny in external dimensions can, in gravity theory drastically affect time and space in the region. In SPUE Theory, however, the black hole, no matter how dense, cannot increase its power over the ambient SPUE Wind -- its pin-point "shadow" in that SPUE flow bends the course of light and energy, but not greatly. Updated thoughts (30-31 August 2004)

(30 August 2004): Note that the power of a black hole is not in its mass (although related to its SPUE-Protection-Factor=SPF), but in the force of the SPUE field in which it is located (location, location, location) (on the atomic level, consider coal versus diamonds 040928). The behavior caused by two black holes (of the same properties) will vary based upon its location (i.e. center of a galaxy versus on its outer arm). In fact, if one doesn't accept "gravity" as an operational concept operating for stars, then one would expect a black hole as a NECESSARY component, an anchor, in forming a stable galactic structure. A collision of black hole anchors could cause disintegration of those cores, dissipation of galactic structure and a large release of SPUE/energy and particles/dust.

(On 31 August 2004): After writing this I saw a Discovery Science Channel program on Supermassive Black Holes. In SPUE Theory, the sequence is clear -- FIRST COMES THE SUPERMASSIVE BLACK HOLE, then the "Galaxy Forms around it from the "Free SPUE". And yes, Black Holes are formed from within stars in a galactic field. In a universe without beginning and infinitely recursive, this model is not a conceptual problem. This "layers of players" model says "small particles" coalesce and accrete until they are promoted up to the next layer -- but eventually, they will collide with others and break-up or disintegrate -- the process is on-going. ("Dust to Dust")

(On 16 September 2004): Most interactions are the effects of SPUE on the core (black hole) of the structure (of the atom or galaxy). When core-to-core collisions occur, massive amounts of energy are released as the "balance" of the system is disturbed, momentarily allowing many larger chunks and free SPUE to exit the system. This is true even if a core doesn't actually break-up. Quasars and nuclear bombs are the result of core-to-core collisions. Long-term radioactivity lingers only if the disturbance actually breaks up one or more cores leaving irregularly shaped or non-homogenous cores. These inherently unbalanced, smaller systems with new rotational characteristics may take a long time to reestablish an "equilibrium neighborhood," if ever. In fusion, where cores coalesce, energy (Freed SPUE) still escapes in massive amounts before the larger, altered spinning rate (also unbalanced somewhat) merged-core/binary system, can establish a new "equilibrium neighborhood" different from either of the parents (in our current terms, a new chemical like H+H -> He). In galactic collisions the "heavier" composite core slows down escaping SPUE (which was balanced for the smaller source systems) increasing Red Shift and appearing much farther away.

(On 18 September 2004): Why do stars and galaxies "ignite" and emit so much energy? Long ago in an astrophysics course they mused how much larger Jupiter would have to grow in order to ignite into another sun and turn us into a binary system. (Things like this are the things that scared me and left indelible fears -- like the super-light-speed supernova fragments mentioned above.) Anyway, from SPUE Theory is becomes clear that "stars" ignite when their "SPUE Protection Factor - SPF" becomes high enough (i.e., in gravity terms "are big & dense enough"). At this point, it's shadowing effect in its equilibrium neighborhood, causes externally passing SPUE blobs to be "pressured" into its "free SPUE" field and cause routine CORE Collisions with its resulting energy release.

Van der Waals Force -- not so unexpected

(On 21 September 2004): In constructing the meta-tags for the home page I was reminded that I saw two recent references to the Van der Waals force. I know I had run across that term 30 or 40 years ago in physics, but had lost track of its meaning. All I remembered that it was like the "crazy cousin" in the family that no one likes to talk about. I figured this may be the "straw that breaks the camel's back" in terms of negating SPUE Theory tenants, but I decided to check it out anyway and include the term (for positive or negative impact) in the meta-tag keyword list. Those of you who know about the Van der Waals force are probably laughing by now. The site I found was from a programming assignment in a computer science course ("CS 267" at <http://www.cs.berkeley.edu>). The programming assignment #5 made the concept very clear. The assignment was to program the actions of a school of fish -- showing how they all hang together, but each maintains its "personal space". In physics terms, the Van der Waals forces are REPULSIVE at very close distances -- a counteraction to normal, attractive gravitational forces. The joke here is that this is exactly the behavior predicted by SPUE theory -- everything emits SPUE and if you get too close to an object, you are repelled by its outward flow. A previous comment above discusses the elliptic (equatorial plane) as the maximal SPUE emitting plane. This plane is the most likely to support orbiting objects as each will find its "balance point" between outward SPUE from the planet/nucleus/galaxy and the inward pressure of Universal SPUE caused by the shadow of that core object. (Well, SPUE Theory dodges another bullet!)

WACCO Spin-off: 26 September 2004 Inserted note --

If a black hole didn't spin and cause continually changing forces interacting with the Universal SPUE wind, it could serve as a speck of dust that allows a snowflake to form. (Snowflake Crystals: <http://dwb.unl.edu/Teacher/NSF/C10/C10Links/chemistry.about.com/library/weekly/aa010499a.htm> )

Since 18 April 2005, you are visitor number:

The Fate of the Universe hangs in the balance of dynamics: spin, outflow & shadows!