Tesla Topics and Crackpot Sites like SPUE Theory
29 May 2005 Note: There are testable differences in the two definitions of gravity. A paradigm shift here (from anyone, not just me) will launch many new technologies. There are inventors and scientists who have the "proof," they just don't see a unifying, underlying theory which will convert their "crackpot" status into "accepted science." See sources like: <http://www.hutchisoneffect.com/> , <http://www.amasci.com/>, <WallacePatents> <http://www.gravity.org/>
From Bill Beaty's
<http://amasci.com/freenrg/antigrav.html>
This page is an unabashed collection of both mainstream and far-fringe Antigravity files and links. Where professionals fear to tread, the lead is taken by amateurs, maverick researchers, and crackpot inventors. This is not necessarily a bad thing. After all, mainstream scientists once regarded the crazy inventors of "flying machines" with smug amusement if not outright disgust. As a result, modern aviation came not from conventional science, but from the arena of "crackpot" flying-machine inventors. Those who smugly dismiss the crazy antigravity inventors of today would have fit right in with those who ridiculed all the amateur aerodynamicists at the turn of the century.
--------- Other Searches ----- (Tesla Links and Extended Credits to Bill Beaty)
Search Results on This and Other Crackpot "Universal Field Theory" sites (19 Apr 2005)